Doubt about Twinfield future under Wolters Kluwer
Twinfield is long-running and stable, but product development moves slower than at Exact and Yuki. Fine for accounting firms, less so for growing businesses with integration wishes.
Try this first
- 1List the integrations you need today: bank, webshop, OCR, payroll
- 2Ask the Twinfield partner which work natively and which go through a third party
- 3Compare total cost: Twinfield licence plus connectors plus accountant hours
- 4Gauge how often your accountant now advises a different package, that says something about the roadmap
When to bring us in
On an active switch consideration, do not move mid year, plan around year-end and align with the accountant.
See also
- Switching from Exact Online to Yuki, open items and history do not matchPackage migrations stumble on ledger mapping and open AR/AP. Without a mapping table you lose context.
- Twinfield to Exact, dimensions and cost centres go missingTwinfield uses dimensions, Exact uses cost centres and projects. The mapping is not one-to-one.
- Accountant asks for RGS mapping, your ledger does not follow RGSRGS is the Dutch standard chart that SBR filings and accountant software expect. Without mapping, every year-end is manual.
None of the above fits?
Describe your situation below. We pass your input plus the steps you already saw to our AI and return tailored next-step advice. If it's too risky to DIY, we'll say so.
Or skip the DIY entirely
Our Managed IT clients do not look these things up. One point of contact, a fixed monthly price, resolved within working hours.