Skip to content

A local LLM on our own hardware, who benefits?

A handful of use cases with strict data isolation. For most SMBs it costs more than a cloud DPA.

Try this first

  1. 1Who benefits: organisations contractually unable to send data outside their own server room (defence supply, some health, some legal).
  2. 2Hardware: a 70B-class model (Llama 3.x 70B or similar) wants at minimum 1x H100 80GB for FP16; with quantisation (FP8/INT4) it runs on weaker GPUs at a quality trade-off. That is investment, not subscription.
  3. 3Operations: model updates, monitoring, security patches. Budget half an FTE for ongoing operations if you mean it.
  4. 4Quality: open-source models can compete with earlier-generation closed-source models on specific tasks after fine-tuning, not automatically general purpose.
  5. 5Run the business case first. Many parties asking this never even checked Azure OpenAI with EU residency under a DPA.

When to bring us in

Pre-investment check before buying hardware: we run the TCO compare between local and cloud, saves a costly misstep.

See also

None of the above fits?

Describe your situation below. We pass your input plus the steps you already saw to our AI and return tailored next-step advice. If it's too risky to DIY, we'll say so.

Who are you?

For the AI question we need your email and company, so we can follow up if the AI gets stuck, and to prevent abuse.

Limited to 2 questions per hour and 5 per day, kept lean so the AI stays useful. For more, contacting us directly works better for you and us.

Or skip the DIY entirely

Our Managed IT clients do not look these things up. One point of contact, a fixed monthly price, resolved within working hours.