Skip to content

Microsoft partner pushes an Azure landing zone, sounds like overkill

A full Cloud Adoption Framework landing zone with management groups, policy and Sentinel is often more infra than app for 5 to 30 staff. A trimmed version usually fits better.

Try this first

  1. 1Start with one production and one non-production subscription, not twelve
  2. 2Force MFA, named admin accounts, and cost alerts from day one, that part is non-negotiable
  3. 3Skip Sentinel and Defender for Cloud Plan 2 until you actually have a SOC or MDR
  4. 4Add Azure Policy only where you have a real rule, not "best practice" off a PDF

When to bring us in

Regulated industries (healthcare, finance) or a future NIS2 role: a full landing zone earns its keep, but tie the design to the law, not to a template.

See also

None of the above fits?

Describe your situation below. We pass your input plus the steps you already saw to our AI and return tailored next-step advice. If it's too risky to DIY, we'll say so.

Who are you?

For the AI question we need your email and company, so we can follow up if the AI gets stuck, and to prevent abuse.

Limited to 2 questions per hour and 5 per day, kept lean so the AI stays useful. For more, contacting us directly works better for you and us.

Or skip the DIY entirely

Our Managed IT clients do not look these things up. One point of contact, a fixed monthly price, resolved within working hours.