Skip to content

Fixed retainer or pay-per-hour, which is cheaper for SMB

With few requests pay-per-hour wins. With a predictable baseline plus incidents the retainer wins. For a growing business the retainer almost always wins.

Try this first

  1. 1Look back at last year. How many hours of external IT work did you actually buy. Multiply by hourly rate. That is your real cost on the per-hour model.
  2. 2Compare with a retainer quote. A fixed monthly fee buys scale: engineer pool, monitoring, knowledge base. At the same hour usage retainer often lands lower than ad-hoc.
  3. 3Count risk. On per-hour an outage is two days of work at acute rates, often after-hours with surcharge. On retainer that response is in-scope.
  4. 4Maintenance is predictable, incidents are not. A retainer covers the predictable and absorbs part of the unpredictable. Per-hour covers neither proactively.
  5. 5The real argument is predictability. For management an identical IT bill each month is easier than something different every month. Cashflow planning wins there.

When to bring us in

For a comparison of retainer cost against your current pay-per-hour practice, /contact.

See also

None of the above fits?

Describe your situation below. We pass your input plus the steps you already saw to our AI and return tailored next-step advice. If it's too risky to DIY, we'll say so.

Who are you?

For the AI question we need your email and company, so we can follow up if the AI gets stuck, and to prevent abuse.

Limited to 2 questions per hour and 5 per day, kept lean so the AI stays useful. For more, contacting us directly works better for you and us.

Or skip the DIY entirely

Our Managed IT clients do not look these things up. One point of contact, a fixed monthly price, resolved within working hours.