Using AI for code reviews on pull requests
AI catches many small issues early, but misses your repo context. Treat it as a first reader, not the senior reviewer.
Try this first
- 1Limit AI review to style, bugs and simple mistakes
- 2Have a human judge architecture and security
- 3Hand AI your coding guidelines as context, less noise
- 4Tag AI-generated comments for the author
When to bring us in
If AI consistently misses solid comments, recalibrate.
See also
- Can I paste a customer file or email into ChatGPT?Depends on the account and settings. Free ChatGPT and a Team tenant behave very differently from what most people assume.
- I want a one-page AI policy for my teamA real one-pager beats a thick document nobody reads. Four headers and concrete examples.
- How do I tell if an AI answer is made up?Models sound confident even when they are wrong. A few habits catch most mistakes.
None of the above fits?
Describe your situation below. We pass your input plus the steps you already saw to our AI and return tailored next-step advice. If it's too risky to DIY, we'll say so.
Or skip the DIY entirely
Our Managed IT clients do not look these things up. One point of contact, a fixed monthly price, resolved within working hours.