Three iPaaS tools, no idea which fits which flow
Zapier wins on connector breadth and simple admin, Make on visual modelling of loops and branches, n8n on self-hosting and low marginal cost at volume.
Try this first
- 1Low volume, broad integrations, non-technical admin: Zapier
- 2Mid volume, complex data transforms and routing: Make
- 3High volume, custom code, sensitive data that should not sit at a US SaaS: self-hosted n8n
- 4A mix is normal: Zapier for sales flows, n8n for production flows touching customer data
When to bring us in
With more than a handful of critical flows lacking an owner, fix ownership and monitoring first, otherwise you only shift the problem.
See also
- n8n: self-host or cloud?Self-hosted is cheaper at volume and keeps data local. Cloud removes ops burden.
- Zapier or Make: which fits better?Zapier is straight-line; Make handles complex flows with routers and iterators for less money.
- Power Automate Cloud or Desktop: which to use?Cloud for SaaS integrations and triggers. Desktop for RPA against legacy Windows apps without APIs.
None of the above fits?
Describe your situation below. We pass your input plus the steps you already saw to our AI and return tailored next-step advice. If it's too risky to DIY, we'll say so.
Or skip the DIY entirely
Our Managed IT clients do not look these things up. One point of contact, a fixed monthly price, resolved within working hours.