Skip to content

We supply algorithms or AI models to government, what about the algorithm register?

The Dutch government pushes transparency via a central algorithm register. For AI or rule-engine vendors that means delivering documentation your customer can publish.

Try this first

  1. 1Ask the customer which fields the contracting authority publishes. Purpose, mechanism, risks, evaluation and governance are typical asks.
  2. 2Deliver a readable model card: purpose, inputs, outputs, limitations, how it was trained, how it is monitored and known risks.
  3. 3Document who is accountable for maintenance, retraining and decommissioning. The government wants a contact and a process, not a black box.
  4. 4Cross-reference EU AI Act. A high-risk system under the AI Act carries extra documentation duties that often overlap with the register.
  5. 5Schedule an annual review of the registration with the customer. Models drift, the register has to follow.

When to bring us in

Building systems that decide on citizens' rights or services? An independent ethical and legal review is more than a formality.

See also

None of the above fits?

Describe your situation below. We pass your input plus the steps you already saw to our AI and return tailored next-step advice. If it's too risky to DIY, we'll say so.

Who are you?

For the AI question we need your email and company, so we can follow up if the AI gets stuck, and to prevent abuse.

Limited to 2 questions per hour and 5 per day, kept lean so the AI stays useful. For more, contacting us directly works better for you and us.

Or skip the DIY entirely

Our Managed IT clients do not look these things up. One point of contact, a fixed monthly price, resolved within working hours.